[Rd] Re: [Omega-devel] StatDataML Description element

[Paul Gilbert]

>> be?  I can imagine a "Data Quality Stamp or Certification" being
relevant
> >within certain communities and it would be nice to have that in the
> >meta-data description, perhaps as a separate argument.]

>something like a RSA-key included in the description? will think about
>this!

I would think of any certification as being part of the "communication
protocol". I could see a place in the data format for indicating the
source, description, and possibly a special field for the the source's
assessment of the quality. If you really want  certification ( =
authentication)  you should have the whole thing encrypted so that it
needs to be unencrypted with the source's public key, but you have to do
that outside the format description (and you need PKI infastructure to
do it correctly).

Paul Gilbert


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._