[BioC] Rma method for library xps
cstrato
cstrato at aon.at
Thu Mar 26 20:35:59 CET 2009
Dear Annamaria
If you look at the help file ?rma you will see the following:
Following exonlevel annotations are valid for whole genome arrays:
core: probesets with category "unique", "similar" and "mixed".
metacore: probesets with category "unique" only.
affx: standard AFFX controls.
all: combination of above (including affx)
Thus in your case you need to use one of:
- exonlevel = "core+affx", or:
- exonlevel = "all"
For an explanation of the different categories see the README file
coming with the HuGene annotation, especially the section on
"crosshyb_type".
Best regards
Christian
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
C.h.r.i.s.t.i.a.n S.t.r.a.t.o.w.a
V.i.e.n.n.a A.u.s.t.r.i.a
e.m.a.i.l: cstrato at aon.at
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
carissimo at tigem.it wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> j'm using the library xps in order to analyse some .cel file from Human
> Gene 1.0 st.
> J have the Scheme for the chip and the Root Tree for the Cel files, when J
> use the RMA method to compute expression levels, in the output file j have
> only 25927 records instead of 33297 that is the total number of
> transcript units.
> J used this instruction
> data.rma<-
> rma(data.banfi,"DataRma",filedir=datadir,tmpdir="",background="antigenomic",
> normalize=T,exonlevel="metacore+affx")
>
> Where is the problem?
>
> Thank you
>
> Annamaria Carissimo
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ricordate che e' sempre possibile contribuire alla raccolta fondi di Telethon
> Remember that it is always possible to send your donation
>
> Scoprilo alla pagina: http://www.telethon.it/comedonare/default.aspx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>
>
>
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list