[R-sig-ME] Why se.fit differ in predict.glm and predict.glmmadmb?

[Xandre]

Thanks a lot Ben Bolker. Now it is working properly.

Cheers,

Alex


El 09/05/2016 a las 16:34, Ben Bolker escribió:
> Ben Bolker <bbolker at ...> writes:
>
>> Xandre <alex <at> ...> writes:
>>
>>
>>    It looks like glmmADMB is getting the estimate of the correlation
>> between the fixed effects wrong (I don't yet know whether this is
>> a problem with
>> the optimization in AD Model Builder or an actual bug in the translation
>> of results from ADMB output to R):
>>
>    Update: it turns out that you found a serious, long-standing
> bug in glmmADMB.  I've just moved glmmADMB development to
>
> https://github.com/bbolker/glmmadmb
>
> so I'm hoping you can simply install the new version via
>
> devtools::install_github("bbolker/glmmadmb")
>
> and see if that solves the problem
>
>   cheers
>      Ben Bolker
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>