[R-meta] Questions about interpreting the intercept in a rma.mv model
m@@|e|n @end|ng |rom zoo|ogy@ubc@c@
Sat May 20 01:49:03 CEST 2023
Currently working on a meta-analysis and wondering about how to interpret the intercept in a rma.mv output with lnRR as the effect size and several binary categorical moderators? When I put in the -1 to remove the intercept, it doesn’t provide the full estimates for levels across all categorical moderators? How do I get the model output to provide estimates for all levels of all categorical moderators – is there an additional argument for this?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis