[R-sig-Geo] plot.autoKrige and standard breaks for coloring

[Paul Hiemstra]

Hi,

My advice would be to take the plot.autoKrige function and adapt it to 
your specific needs.

cheers,
Paul

On 07/08/2010 11:40 AM, Mark Connolly wrote:
> I was getting an error, but it looks as though I was over-specifying.
>
> works:
> plot(sl.ak,col.regions=plotclr, at=class$brks)
>
> does not work (I was using an example for spplot that specified cuts 
> for some unknown reason):
> plot(sl.ak,col.regions=plotclr, at=class$brks, cuts=nclr)
>
> So that's good. But, the breaks are appropriate for kriging prediction 
> classes but not standard error classes.  Can I control both?
>
>
> On 07/08/2010 04:01 AM, Paul Hiemstra wrote:
>> On 07/07/2010 11:55 PM, Mark Connolly wrote:
>>> plot.autoKrige does a nice job of laying out the predicted surface, 
>>> the standard error and the fitted variogram (over the sample 
>>> variogram).
>>>
>>> Is there a way to set the breaks used for coloring the prediction 
>>> surface so I can get the same breaks across a series of plots?  For 
>>> example, with spplot, I can use 'at' to set the breaks at standard 
>>> locations.  I can set col.regions with plot.autoKrige, but I can't 
>>> seem to set the break locations.  Can this be done?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> R-sig-Geo mailing list
>>> R-sig-Geo at stat.math.ethz.ch
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Use the at parameter to set the breaks.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Paul
>>
>


-- 
Drs. Paul Hiemstra
Department of Physical Geography
Faculty of Geosciences
University of Utrecht
Heidelberglaan 2
P.O. Box 80.115
3508 TC Utrecht
Phone:  +3130 253 5773
http://intamap.geo.uu.nl/~paul
http://nl.linkedin.com/pub/paul-hiemstra/20/30b/770