[R-sig-Geo] plot.autoKrige and standard breaks for coloring

[Mark Connolly]

Thanks.  I'll go that route.

On 07/08/2010 05:39 AM, Paul Hiemstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My advice would be to take the plot.autoKrige function and adapt it to 
> your specific needs.
>
> cheers,
> Paul
>
> On 07/08/2010 11:40 AM, Mark Connolly wrote:
>> I was getting an error, but it looks as though I was over-specifying.
>>
>> works:
>> plot(sl.ak,col.regions=plotclr, at=class$brks)
>>
>> does not work (I was using an example for spplot that specified cuts 
>> for some unknown reason):
>> plot(sl.ak,col.regions=plotclr, at=class$brks, cuts=nclr)
>>
>> So that's good. But, the breaks are appropriate for kriging 
>> prediction classes but not standard error classes.  Can I control both?
>>
>>
>> On 07/08/2010 04:01 AM, Paul Hiemstra wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2010 11:55 PM, Mark Connolly wrote:
>>>> plot.autoKrige does a nice job of laying out the predicted surface, 
>>>> the standard error and the fitted variogram (over the sample 
>>>> variogram).
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to set the breaks used for coloring the prediction 
>>>> surface so I can get the same breaks across a series of plots?  For 
>>>> example, with spplot, I can use 'at' to set the breaks at standard 
>>>> locations.  I can set col.regions with plot.autoKrige, but I can't 
>>>> seem to set the break locations.  Can this be done?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> R-sig-Geo mailing list
>>>> R-sig-Geo at stat.math.ethz.ch
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Use the at parameter to set the breaks.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>
>
>