[R-pkg-devel] Failed CRAN tar.gz upload to CRAN
Chris Brien
chr|@@br|en @end|ng |rom @de|@|de@edu@@u
Fri Jan 13 22:51:01 CET 2023
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for taking up my query.
I realized after I sent the message that I should have added that the package files is being dropped as well. It replaces my file name with "No file chosen". Consequently I cannot continue submit the package.
I saw it as an error message because it is not a message that I have seen in the many times that I have uploaded a package to CRAN.
My interpretation of the message was that there is some "non-editable" material in the package information, most likely the DESCRIPTION file.
However, I doubted that this could be the case because the only changes in the DESCRIPTION file since I uploaded Version 2.1.16 two months ago are in the Version, Date, Packaged and Suggests, the latter having writeXLS removed because it is no longer needed. I have verified that these are the only changed by extracting the DESCRIPTION file from both growthPheno_2.1.16 and 2.1.17 and doing a file comparison on them.
This led me to think that the problem must be in other than the DESCRIPTION file.
Unfortunately, I remain unable to upload the package.
Cheers,
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Krylov <krylov.r00t using gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2023 12:37 AM
> To: Chris Brien <chris.brien using adelaide.edu.au>
> Cc: r-package-devel using r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Failed CRAN tar.gz upload to CRAN
>
> CAUTION: External email. Only click on links or open attachments from
> trusted senders.
>
> В Fri, 13 Jan 2023 08:54:50 +0000
> Chris Brien <chris.brien using adelaide.edu.au> пишет:
>
> > I am getting the following response when I try to upload
> > growthPheno_2.1.17.tar.gz:
> >
> > Detected package information [non-editable] In case of errors reupload
> > the package or contact cran team
>
> That's not an error. This message is to inform you that the following fields
> have been extracted from your DESCRIPTION file and aren't supposed to be
> edited by hand. Is there a better way to phrase that?
>
> Do you see anything out of place in the form? If the form content seems OK,
> click the "Submit package" button near the bottom of the page to continue.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Ivan
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list