[R-pkg-devel] email misleading: checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer

Spencer Graves @pencer@gr@ve@ @end|ng |rom e||ect|vede|en@e@org
Mon Jun 8 16:52:44 CEST 2020


Hi, Uwe et al.:


       What's the preferred way to eliminate tests on CRAN that the 
maintainer still wants to run on other platforms?


       For several years, I've been using "if(!fda::CRAN()){...}". I've 
been told that I should NOT do that, but it has worked for me, and I 
haven't found anything better.  I've recently seen 
"testthat::skip_on_cran(...)", but I have yet to understand enough of 
how it works to actually use it.


       Thanks,
       Spencer Graves


On 2020-06-08 09:43, stefano wrote:
> Hello Uwe,
>
> OK sorry for that.
>
> Best wishes.
>
> *Stefano *
>
>
>
> Stefano Mangiola | Postdoctoral fellow
>
> Papenfuss Laboratory
>
> The Walter Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
>
> +61 (0)466452544
>
>
> Il giorno mar 9 giu 2020 alle ore 00:40 Uwe Ligges <
> ligges using statistik.tu-dortmund.de> ha scritto:
>
>>
>> On 08.06.2020 16:26, stefano wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like to point out that I (and others in various forums) find that
>>> the CRAN check with the note :
>>>
>>>
>>> *checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTEMaintainer*
>>
>> Not true, it also says
>>
>> Flavor: r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
>> Check: running examples for arch 'x64', Result: NOTE
>>     Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s
>>                               user system elapsed
>>     lower_triangular-methods 11.48      0    11.5
>>
>> Please reduce each example to less than 5 sec.
>>
>> Best,
>> Uwe Ligges
>>> Triggers an email saying
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) *package nanny_0.1.7.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
>>> automatically*
>>>
>>> 2) *Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform*
>>>
>>>
>>> While apparently nothing should be done, at least according to some forum
>>> post
>>>
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23829978/checking-cran-incoming-feasibility-note-maintainer
>>> It would be nice to avoid this from the test side or the email side. It
>> is
>>> pretty confusing for developers who think that they have to act.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best wishes.
>>>
>>> *Stefano *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Stefano Mangiola | Postdoctoral fellow
>>>
>>> Papenfuss Laboratory
>>>
>>> The Walter Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
>>>
>>> +61 (0)466452544
>>>
>>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel



More information about the R-package-devel mailing list