[R-pkg-devel] email misleading: checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer

[stefano]

Hello Uwe,

OK sorry for that.

Best wishes.

*Stefano *



Stefano Mangiola | Postdoctoral fellow

Papenfuss Laboratory

The Walter Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research

+61 (0)466452544


Il giorno mar 9 giu 2020 alle ore 00:40 Uwe Ligges <
ligges using statistik.tu-dortmund.de> ha scritto:

>
>
> On 08.06.2020 16:26, stefano wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to point out that I (and others in various forums) find that
> > the CRAN check with the note :
> >
> >
> > *checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTEMaintainer*
>
>
> Not true, it also says
>
> Flavor: r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
> Check: running examples for arch 'x64', Result: NOTE
>    Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s
>                              user system elapsed
>    lower_triangular-methods 11.48      0    11.5
>
> Please reduce each example to less than 5 sec.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
> >
> > Triggers an email saying
> >
> >
> > 1) *package nanny_0.1.7.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
> > automatically*
> >
> > 2) *Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform*
> >
> >
> > While apparently nothing should be done, at least according to some forum
> > post
> >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23829978/checking-cran-incoming-feasibility-note-maintainer
> >
> > It would be nice to avoid this from the test side or the email side. It
> is
> > pretty confusing for developers who think that they have to act.
> >
> >
> > Best wishes.
> >
> > *Stefano *
> >
> >
> >
> > Stefano Mangiola | Postdoctoral fellow
> >
> > Papenfuss Laboratory
> >
> > The Walter Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
> >
> > +61 (0)466452544
> >
> >       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]