[R-pkg-devel] What constitutes insufficient merit of an r package?
ph||||p@j@rrett1 @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Thu Apr 25 18:44:07 CEST 2019
When submitting a package to the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN),
one requirement for eventual acceptance is novelty of the package and its
workings (i.e., functions, etc.).
That is, a package's contribution cannot be trivial.
The flowchart found here explains things pictorially:
Many R packages contain functions found in other packages. These functions
are not necessarily distinct from those in older R packages.
*What then is meant by 'sufficient merit' of an incoming R package?*
I realize this question is likely to be opinion-based, but it is one that
grabbed my attention nonetheless.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-package-devel