[R] Negative AIC
Corrado
ct529 at york.ac.uk
Thu Sep 10 19:37:17 CEST 2009
I think the problem is trying to compare different models trained don the same
dataset.
1) If I compare for example gam (from gam package) with and without intercept,
is that a valid comparison?
For example: model with intercept has explained dev 24%, with AIC -2217146,
model without intercept has explained dev 85.5% with AIC 217488.1
The results sound incredibly strange, but there is actually no difference in
the model but the removal of the intercept .... :(. So which model is "better"
at fitting the data????
2) If I compare for example gam from gam package with let's say gam from mgcv
(using tpsp), then I get two completely analogous AIC, but are they
comparable?
gam from mgcv package: -2195000
gam from gam package: -2217000
3) I would like to compare those AIC to the AIC obtained by running BRT on the
same dataset. I was thinking of simply recalculating manually the AIC using
the formula:
AIC=2K+N*log(rss/N)
where K is the number of parameters of the regression (i.e. the coefficient that
are not zero, I would think) and N is the number of samples.
What do you think? Would that be reasonable?
Regards
On Thursday 10 September 2009 16:39:32 Ben Bolker wrote:
> If all the models are fitted to the same data set, using the same
> modeling tools (you have to be careful e.g. comparing lmer models to
> glm models, because they use different additive constants), and
> everything seems to make sense (!!!), then yes. I would be a little
> surprised, and think that something was wrong, if you have some AIC
> values that are on the order of -20,000 (as below) and others that are
> +20,000 ...
>
> Ben Bolker
>
> Corrado wrote:
> > My worry is: can I compare negative AIC with positive AIC? does the
> > comparison still hold?
> >
> > On Thursday 10 September 2009 15:57:01 Ben Bolker wrote:
> >> Corrado-5 wrote:
> >>> Dear R list,
> >>>
> >>> I just obtained a negative AIC for two models (-221.7E+4
> >>> and -230.2E+4). Is that normal?
> >>
> >> It's not necessarily wrong. See <http://emdbolker.wikidot.com/faq>
--
Corrado Topi
Global Climate Change & Biodiversity Indicators
Area 18,Department of Biology
University of York, York, YO10 5YW, UK
Phone: + 44 (0) 1904 328645, E-mail: ct529 at york.ac.uk
More information about the R-help
mailing list