[ESS] R-Xemacs ESS printing issue

[Rodney Sparapani]

Leo wrote:
> I agree with you not to further discuss the choices between these two
> variants. But I'd like to point out the following as my last post to
> this subject.
> 

Glad you agree, but then you can't help yourself (and me neither)...

> 1. #Emacs channel has 1130 users while #XEmacs has 24;

What the hell is that?  Honestly, I've been involved in XEmacs testing
and development for 9 years or so and I have never heard of that.
Maybe Emacs has so money bugs that it is generating tons of traffic :o)

> 2. the Emacs development branch commits 100 times more than XEmacs since 2005;
> 3. XEmacs's release packs much fewer features than Emacs. XEmacs just
>    released a new development version, if you like you can compare it to
>    Emacs 23.0.94 and be shocked.
> 

Shocked how?  Tell us more (I'm not joking, if there is magic,
let it be known).  Did this email come from it's new AI package?
Are you a person or am I talking to Emacs :o)

> I think it is objective to say Emacs feature set is a super set of
> XEmacs and that's why I'm recommending it to new users.
> 
> Leo

I disagree.  The XEmacs package system is a killer feature that new
users can benefit from as much as anyone.  'nuff said.

-- 
Rodney Sparapani      Center for Patient Care & Outcomes Research (PCOR)
Sr. Biostatistician              http://www.mcw.edu/pcor
4 wheels good, 2 wheels better!  Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW)
WWLD?:  What Would Lombardi Do?  Milwaukee, WI, USA