[BioC] how to determine what kind of dispersion to use
J [guest]
guest at bioconductor.org
Tue Feb 18 02:53:40 CET 2014
Hello listserve,
Most analysis performed in edgeR rightfully assumes that the data is not Poisson and in fact follows a NB distribution. This information is important when shrinking the dispersions, however I was wondering if there was a graph or function in edgeR that I could make/use to determine what kind of dispersion (i.e. common, moderated tagwise) I need to apply in the exactTest function?
I'm not doing a typical RNA-seq experiment (i.e. RIP-seq) so I would like to test which parts of the classic workflow are appropriate for what I'm doing. For instance, can I still use the same equation to figure out the prior.df, or will that not apply to RIP-seq?
After doing some comparisons between the different functions and arguments within them I'm wondering if RIP-seq may pose a problem when trying to use the moderated dispersion since the reads in the untagged IP will generally be less than the IP samples. Does that seem like a possibility?
Also for the dispersion argument in the exactTest() function, are there good rules of thumb of when to use "common", "trended", "tagwise" or "auto"?
Thanks
-- output of sessionInfo():
> sessionInfo()
R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit)
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] LSD_2.5 ellipse_0.3-8 schoolmath_0.4
[4] colorRamps_2.3 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 gtools_3.2.1
[7] MASS_7.3-29 edgeR_3.4.2 limma_3.18.12
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] tools_3.0.2
--
Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org.
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list