[BioC] filtering probes in affymetrix data
James W. MacDonald
jmacdon at uw.edu
Thu Feb 13 15:36:28 CET 2014
Hi Julia,
There are several different things you can do. I'll show you one
possibility.
First, note that there are multiple different control probes on this
array that aren't intended to measure differential expression, and
should be excluded. So first let's look at the possible types of
probesets:
> library(pd.mogene.2.0.st)
> con <- db(pd.mogene.2.0.st)
> dbGetQuery(con, "select * from type_dict;")
type type_id
1 1 main
2 2 control->affx
3 3 control->chip
4 4 control->bgp->antigenomic
5 5 control->bgp->genomic
6 6 normgene->exon
7 7 normgene->intron
8 8 rescue->FLmRNA->unmapped
9 9 control->affx->bac_spike
10 10 oligo_spike_in
11 11 r1_bac_spike_at
These are all the possible types of probesets, but we don't have all of
them on this array. To see which ones we do have we can do:
> table(dbGetQuery(con, "select type from featureSet;")[,1])
1 2 4 7 9
263551 18 23 5331 18
So we only have these probeset types:
1 1 main
2 2 control->affx
4 4 control->bgp->antigenomic
7 7 normgene->intron
9 9 control->affx->bac_spike
And the 'main' probesets are those that we want to use for differential
expression. Now one thing you could do is to say that the antigenomic
probesets should give a good measure of background, as they are
supposed to have sequences that don't exist in mice. So you could just
extract those probesets, get some measure and use that as the lower
limit of what you think is expressed or not. That's pretty naive, as a
probe with higher GC content will have higher background than one with
a lower GC content, but worrying about that is way beyond what I am
prepared to go into.
Now we can get the probeset IDs for the antigenomic probesets
antigm <- dbGetQuery(con, "select meta_fsetid from core_mps inner join
featureSet on core_mps.fsetid=featureSet.fsetid where
featureSet.type='4';")
And then extract those probesets and get a summary statistic.
bkg <- apply(exprs(eset)[as.character(antigm[,1]),], 2, quantile,
probs=0.95)
Which will give us the 95th percentile of these background probes. You
could then use the kOverA function in genefilter to filter out any
probesets where all samples are below the background values. The idea
being that you want to filter out any probesets unless k samples have
expression levels >= A. So if you have 10 samples, where 5 are controls
and 5 are treated, you would do something like
minval <- max(bkg)
ind <- genefilter(eset, filterfun(kOverA(5, minval)))
eset.filt <- eset[ind,]
You should also filter out all the non-main probesets. You can do that
using getMainProbes() in the affycoretools package
eset.filt <- getMainProbes(eset.filt)
Best,
Jim
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:16:31 PM, Sabet, Julia A wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am totally new to R/Bioconductor and have begun processing data from my Affymetrix Mouse Gene 2.0 ST arrays. I normalized the data like this:
>
> library(pd.mogene.2.0.st)
> eset <- rma(affyRaw)
>
> and added gene annotation and I am following the limma user's guide, which recommends removing "probes that appear not be
> expressed in any of the experimental conditions." I have read on previous posts that filtering may not be necessary. Should I filter, and if so, how? Using what code?
>
> Thank you!
> Julia Sabet
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
--
James W. MacDonald, M.S.
Biostatistician
University of Washington
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences
4225 Roosevelt Way NE, # 100
Seattle WA 98105-6099
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list