[BioC] Best way of presenting a sub-fraction of edgeR RNAseq gene expression results in a publication
Gordon K Smyth
smyth at wehi.EDU.AU
Sun Feb 2 01:51:12 CET 2014
Dear Sindre,
Just run edgeR as usual on all genes. Run topTags() with n=Inf to get a
table of DE results for all genes:
tab <- topTags(yourresults, n=Inf)
Then subset the table for just the 5 genes you are interested in. For
example, if your results include a column of gene symbols, this might be:
tab5 <- tab[tab$table$Symbol %in% mygenes,]
tab5
When you report the table, there is no need to include the FDR or multiple
testing column because the genes have been chosen a priori. Just judge
significance from the PValue column.
Best wishes
Gordon
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:49:18 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Sindre [guest]" <guest at bioconductor.org>
> To: bioconductor at r-project.org, sindre.lee at studmed.uio.no
> Subject: [BioC] Best way of presenting a sub-fraction of edgeR RNAseq
> gene expression results in a publication
>
>
> Hi!
> We selected a priori 5 genes to analyse and want to include them in a
> table for publication.
>
> Question is how to present them? Normally we would calculate fold
> changes (or percent) with standard deviation and then mark if
> significant.
>
> edgeR, as far as I understand, uses shrunken fold changes and the
> dispersion is squeezed using an empirical Bayes method. Thus, its hard
> to manually reproduce the results from logCPM values.
>
> So, whats the best way?
>
> Thank you!
>
> -- output of sessionInfo():
>
> No codes used.
>
> --
> Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org.
______________________________________________________________________
The information in this email is confidential and intend...{{dropped:4}}
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list