[BioC] Normalize data across platforms
Priscila Darakjian
darakjia at ohsu.edu
Tue Mar 31 18:35:16 CEST 2009
Maybe this will help you regarding control probes across platforms --> https://aberdeen.ac.uk/ims/facilities/microarray/documents/chipcontrols.doc
Regards
Priscila
-----Original Message-----
From: bioconductor-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:bioconductor-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Steve Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:46 AM
To: michael watson (IAH-C)
Cc: Bioconductor
Subject: Re: [BioC] Normalize data across platforms
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
>
> Quantile normalisation is a very conservative normalisation, and there are fears in some quarters that it may lead to over-normalisation. However, as you're comparing between datasets, this may be what you're after.
>
I agree. I am just looking for large differences so I am hoping it might be ok.
> Alternatively, have you considered using "housekeeping" or control genes? These should be constant across arrays, experiments etc (if you believe in them) and so could provide a good normalisation factor.
>
Does anyone know if affy has control probes that are consistent across platforms?
Kind regards and thanks,
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------
Medical Sciences Division
Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine/Sir William Dunn School
Oxford University
_______________________________________________
Bioconductor mailing list
Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list