[BioC] Dye effect problem with Limma package
Jean-Laurent Ichanté
jean-laurent.ichante at cgm.cnrs-gif.fr
Mon Mar 16 16:35:16 CET 2009
Dear All,
I have one question that makes me perplex, and no message concerning
this problem is described in the mailing list.
I'm using the Limma package for the comparison of two experimental
conditions (KO vs WT) in a 'reference design' with dye-swap.
My experimental design is the following:
Cy5 Cy3
Array1 Ref WT
Array2 Ref WT
Array3 Ref WT
Array4 WT Ref
Array5 WT Ref
Array6 WT Ref
Array7 Ref KO
Array8 Ref KO
Array9 Ref KO
Array10 KO Ref
Array11 KO Ref
Array12 KO Ref
In such design it is possible to estimate a dye effect.
First, I have fitted a very simple model.
> fit1 <- lmFit(MA, design=design1)
where design1 is the following design matrix:
> design1
KO WT
208_REF-WT.1B 0 -1
213_REF-WT.25B 0 -1
301_REF-WT.3B 0 -1
210_WT.2B-REF 0 1
215_WT.26B-REF 0 1
304_WT.5B-REF 0 1
209_REF-KO.28B -1 0
214_REF-KO.27B -1 0
303_REF-KO.13B -1 0
211_KO.18B-REF 1 0
300_KO.15B-REF 1 0
302_KO.17B-REF 1 0
Then I have fitted a second model including dye effect.
> fit2 <- lmFit(MA, design=design2)
where design2 is the following design matrix:
> design2
DyeEffect KO WT
208_REF-WT.1B 1 0 -1
213_REF-WT.25B 1 0 -1
301_REF-WT.3B 1 0 -1
210_WT.2B-REF 1 0 1
215_WT.26B-REF 1 0 1
304_WT.5B-REF 1 0 1
209_REF-KO.28B 1 -1 0
214_REF-KO.27B 1 -1 0
303_REF-KO.13B 1 -1 0
211_KO.18B-REF 1 1 0
300_KO.15B-REF 1 1 0
302_KO.17B-REF 1 1 0
In theory fitted values should be identical for the two coefficients (KO
and WT), but in my case observed values are different (for certain genes).
> fit1$coef[1:5,]
KO WT
[1,] -0.8372489 -0.19457588
[2,] -0.3208879 -0.15328678
[3,] -0.7202544 -0.69133039
[4,] -0.1262356 -0.08165633
[5,] -0.2568482 -0.18354345
> fit2$coef[1:5,]
DyeEffect KO WT
[1,] -0.411091881 -0.8372489 -0.27679426
[2,] -0.007895425 -0.3182560 -0.15328678
[3,] -0.004396641 -0.7202544 -0.69133039
[4,] 0.200046876 -0.1262356 -0.08165633
[5,] -0.052855276 -0.2568482 -0.19411451
What is the origin of these differences?
Does anybody have any suggestions?
Thanks again
Jean-Laurent
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list