[BioC] Appropriate Probe annotation for HT-HGU133A chips
Thomas Hampton
Thomas.H.Hampton at Dartmouth.edu
Wed Apr 22 20:58:25 CEST 2009
While we are on this subject, what is the difference between this "db"
and the old way of annotation I still use?
I use something like:
librarary(hgu133a2)
Am I a dinosaur?
Thanks!
Tom
On Apr 22, 2009, at 2:51 PM, James W. MacDonald wrote:
> Hi Hannah,
>
> If I'm not mistaken, you want the hgu133a2.db.
>
> Best,
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> Tipney, Hannah wrote:
>> Please forgive this probably obvious question, but I am working with
>> data from the High Throughput Affymetrix chips for the first time. So
>> simply, for the ht-hgu133a chips should I be using the hgu133a.db,
>> hgu133a2.db or hgu133plus2.db Bioconductor probe annotations in
>> conjunction with hthgu133acdf and hthgu133aprobe? I assume hgu133a.db
>> but it is not entirely clear from the Affymetrix site. Thanks in
>> advance Hannah
>> _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing
>> list Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/
>> listinfo/bioconductor Search the
>> archives:
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>
> --
> James W. MacDonald, M.S.
> Biostatistician
> Douglas Lab
> University of Michigan
> Department of Human Genetics
> 5912 Buhl
> 1241 E. Catherine St.
> Ann Arbor MI 48109-5618
> 734-615-7826
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/
> gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list