[BioC] Re: Bioconductor Digest, Vol 11, Issue 12
Stephen P. Baker
stephen.baker at umassmed.edu
Sat Jan 10 15:44:11 MET 2004
Bioconductor Digest, Vol 11, Issue 12In my previous post should have said "...any effect that is significant by ANOVA with RMA or PM only estimates would also be evidence of presence EXCEPT for intercept terms as there will always be nonspecific binding.
----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen P. Baker
To: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: Bioconductor Digest, Vol 11, Issue 12
I would think that ANY significant differential expression by ANOVA is evidence of presence. Also if using MAS5 or LiWong PM-MM, any significant effect including intercept would be evidence of presence but I don't think the same can be said of RMA or PM only estimates.
-.- -.. .---- .--. ..-.
Stephen P. Baker, MScPH , PhD(ABD) (508) 856-2625
Senior Biostatistician (775) 254-4885 fax
Information Services Bioinformatics Unit
Lecturer in Biostatistics , Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
University of Massachusetts Medical School
55 Lake Avenue North stephen.baker at umassmed.edu
Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the Bioconductor