[Bioc-devel] Updated check results page

Byron Ellis ellis at stat.harvard.edu
Fri Nov 11 03:24:28 CET 2005

I prefer Style B, though I think that the Error and Missing should be  
reversed---Error is often more interesting than Missing and Missing's  
styling stands out much better.

On Nov 10, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Seth Falcon wrote:

> Hi All,
> First off, I would like to introduce Herve Pages, a new member of our
> group here in Seattle.
> Herve has been working on some improvements to the package build/check
> system including a face-lift for the check results page.
> Our goal is a more reliable build system with results that are easier
> for you as package developers to use.
> Please have a look at the two proposed report formats and tell us what
> you think.
> http://www.bioconductor.org/checkResults/checkResults.html
> Best Wishes,
> + seth
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Byron Ellis (ellis at stat.harvard.edu)
"Oook" -- The Librarian

More information about the Bioc-devel mailing list