[Bioc-devel] Updated check results page

[Keith Satterley]

Welcome Herve,

I prefer format B as it is more compact.

I would like the glyphs to more distinctive. I think a change of color, 
similar to the old check results would help, or the way they were 
done(changed whilst I as writing this!) in format B.

 I would suggest

ERROR => Red background,  contrasting font color, white or maybe black.
WARNINGS => Yellow background,  contrasting font color,
MISSING => Blue background, contrasting font color,
OK => Green background, white font color

cheers,

Keith Satterley

Herve Pages wrote:

>Robert Gentleman wrote:
>
>  
>
>> I do - and would like ERROR and WARNING to change - at least for me, 
>>I find them hard to read as they are now
>>
>>    
>>
>I changed them. All the glyphs are now written in white on a dark 
>background. There
>are subtle variations in the different backgrounds though.
>
>  
>
>>>>I see a single svn value on the page, is that maintainable? Are all 
>>>>platforms built off the same checkout?
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Yes, all packages are built off the same checkout.
>>>And all the builds/checks on all nodes are made with the same R (same 
>>>rev. numer
>>>too). I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "is it 
>>>maintainable?"...
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>  can we keep all in sync? Sometimes we may want to report a Linux 
>>build off a new checkout, but have not finished the windows build etc? 
>>So then what do we do? Keep the new builds off line until we can build 
>>on all platforms?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, we have to wait that all builds are done on all platforms before we can
>generate this cross report.
>
>Hervé
>
>PS: BTW, do you have a preference between formats A and B?
>
>  
>