Package fCalendar_260.72.tar.gz did not pass R CMD check
Martin Maechler
maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch
Wed Feb 6 15:18:34 CET 2008
>>>>> "YC" == Yohan Chalabi <chalabi at phys.ethz.ch>
>>>>> on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:20:24 +0100 writes:
>>>>> "DE" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>
>>>>> on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:46:30 -0600
DE> 'lots of packages twice a year and silence in-between'.
>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>
>>>>> on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:36:15 +0100
MM> And -- BTW I really think we should slowly discontinue the idea
MM> that Rmetrics is released half-yearly together with new versions
MM> of R.
MM> Rmetrics packages should be dealt with as other R packages are.
YC> I think we all share the same idea. The plan is to make frequent
YC> updates when all Rmetrics packages will be moved to R-forge.
why is this linkt to the packages being on R-forge?
They still must be checked, built, checked and uploaded to CRAN,
no?
YC> This should happen in the following weeks.
If all goes well. Otherwise, note that it may be non-trivial or
impossible if we'd like
- each Rmetrics package is daily checked and built
but still "Rmetrics" should be only one (big fat :-)
R-forge project.
- keeping the current svn history
and that may lead to another few weeks ...
I'd vote to release the package with known bug report "now".
Martin
YC> Yohan
More information about the Rmetrics-core
mailing list