[RsR] New maintainer? Package 'robust' (original S+ "Library 'robust') orphaned on CRAN
Martin Maechler
m@ech|er @end|ng |rom @t@t@m@th@ethz@ch
Thu Mar 5 17:20:55 CET 2020
>>>>> Valentin Todorov
>>>>> on Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:31:21 +0100 writes:
> Dear Martin,
> I was thinking of this since Kjell
> abandoned the package, but I was not sure to what extent would this be
> necessary - most of the functionality of 'robust' we already moved to
> 'robustbase' and/or 'rrcov', therefore it suggests/imports these packages.
> Let us see in the next days what still remains there and is valuable and
> decide what to do.
> Best regards,
> Valentin
Thank you, Valentin.
I had similar thoughts a long time ago, I think prompted
indepedently by Kjell and Doug Martin ...
I vaguely remember I found that there have been things in
'Robust' which looked valuable and notably good to have for
comparison reasons,
*but* that were a lot work to "tear out" of the robust package
(including the necessary underlying Fortran code, but *not*
taking all the Fortran code that would *not* be needed ...).
In the mean time the CRAN team has archived the package
'robust', and I must adapt the 'Robustness' CRAN task view
considerably (and remove the 'Suggests: robust' from my
robustbase package.
I'd be grateful for help and suggestions in still trying
'salvage' valuable resources out of 'robust'.
BTW: Why has rrcovNA be archived?
Best,
Martin
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, 11:03 am Martin Maechler, <maechler using stat.math.ethz.ch>
> wrote:
>> Dear R Robustniks,
>>
>> as I am the maintainer of package 'robustbase' and am submitting
>> a new version of it to CRAN,
>> it came to my knowledge that package 'robust' (= the original
>> S-plus "Library 'robust', then released to CRAN, maintained by
>> Kjell Konis for time) has been orphaned on CRAN relatively
>> recently.
>> As I have 'robust' among the 'Suggests: ' entries of "my"
>> package 'robustbase' I now get a NOTE about suggesting an
>> orphaned package.
>> I've been formally a co-author of that package (togeth
>>
>> I personally would think it to be a loss for the "robustnik
>> community" if this package would not remain easily available
>> (notably on Windows, also the Mac where most people cannot
>> install package from the source but are used to install the
>> binary built package from CRAN).
>>
>> Are some you willing and capable to become the maintainer of
>> 'robust' (with the perspective to do this for a couple of years)?
>>
>> Best,
>> Martin
More information about the R-SIG-Robust
mailing list