[R-sig-ME] gamm shifting residuals in plots

Thierry Onkelinx th|erry@onke||nx @end|ng |rom |nbo@be
Fri Jan 18 10:03:53 CET 2019


The mailing accepts only a limited range of file extensions. Your images
got stripped from your mail. Put them somewhere online and send the link.
Sending a minimal reproducible example is better.

ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Statisticus / Statistician

Vlaamse Overheid / Government of Flanders
INSTITUUT VOOR NATUUR- EN BOSONDERZOEK / RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND
FOREST
Team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / Team Biometrics & Quality Assurance
thierry.onkelinx using inbo.be
Havenlaan 88 bus 73, 1000 Brussel
www.inbo.be

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data.
~ John Tukey
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

<https://www.inbo.be>


Op vr 18 jan. 2019 om 02:11 schreef Vinicius Maia <
vinicius.a.maia using hotmail.com>:

> Hi folks!
>
> When running a gamm and seing its plots I found the residuals locations
> are shifted , I presume its because the gam smooth is fitted after  taking
> the random effects into account (obviously). But I am not understanding how
> its possible to change data points location in these plots. The same is
> valid for the lmer, I usually plot the fitted line whith the residuals, but
> I have never seen this discrepancy in points positions with the fitted line
> before. I would appreciate if anyone could clarify what is happening.
>
> Plots are attached
>
> codes:
>
> a) mod1=gamm(y1_r_prop~s(areia), random =
> list(area=~1,chave=~1),data=dadosest)
> plot(mod1$gam,residuals=TRUE,pch=1.3,shift = coef(mod1$gam)[1])
>
> b) mod2=gamm(y1_r_prop~s(areia), random =
> list(chave=~1),method="ML",data=dadosest)
> plot(mod2$gam,residuals=TRUE,pch=1.3,shift = coef(mod2$gam)[1])
>
> c) mod3=gamm(y1_r_prop~s(areia), random =
> list(area=~1),method="ML",data=dadosest)
> plot(mod3$gam,residuals=TRUE,pch=1.3,shift = coef(mod3$gam)[1])
>
> d) mod4=gam(y1_r_prop~s(areia),method="ML",data=dadosest)
> plot(mod4,residuals=TRUE,pch=1.3,shift = coef(mod4)[1])
>
> e) plot(y1_r_prop~areia)
> curve(18.3048+-2.2142*x,add=TRUE) # coefficients from a lmer with both
> area and chave random effects
>
> Thank you all!
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-sig-mixed-models mailing list