[R-sig-ME] gamm shifting residuals in plots
Vinicius Maia
v|n|c|u@@@@m@|@ @end|ng |rom hotm@||@com
Fri Jan 18 02:11:32 CET 2019
Hi folks!
When running a gamm and seing its plots I found the residuals locations are shifted , I presume its because the gam smooth is fitted after taking the random effects into account (obviously). But I am not understanding how its possible to change data points location in these plots. The same is valid for the lmer, I usually plot the fitted line whith the residuals, but I have never seen this discrepancy in points positions with the fitted line before. I would appreciate if anyone could clarify what is happening.
Plots are attached
codes:
a) mod1=gamm(y1_r_prop~s(areia), random = list(area=~1,chave=~1),data=dadosest)
plot(mod1$gam,residuals=TRUE,pch=1.3,shift = coef(mod1$gam)[1])
b) mod2=gamm(y1_r_prop~s(areia), random = list(chave=~1),method="ML",data=dadosest)
plot(mod2$gam,residuals=TRUE,pch=1.3,shift = coef(mod2$gam)[1])
c) mod3=gamm(y1_r_prop~s(areia), random = list(area=~1),method="ML",data=dadosest)
plot(mod3$gam,residuals=TRUE,pch=1.3,shift = coef(mod3$gam)[1])
d) mod4=gam(y1_r_prop~s(areia),method="ML",data=dadosest)
plot(mod4,residuals=TRUE,pch=1.3,shift = coef(mod4)[1])
e) plot(y1_r_prop~areia)
curve(18.3048+-2.2142*x,add=TRUE) # coefficients from a lmer with both area and chave random effects
Thank you all!
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list