[R-sig-ME] Experience with PyMC3 Bambi package?
jake.a.westfall at gmail.com
Fri Sep 9 17:46:44 CEST 2016
Tal and I would love to hear thoughts and reactions from anyone and
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Phillip Alday <Phillip.Alday at unisa.edu.au>
> I haven't tried Bambi just yet, but the PyMC3 package upon which it is
> built has been really quite nice in my experience. The only reason why
> I wasn't using PyMC3 more extensively is that it was a pain to
> construct the model for complicated GLM(M)s and they only had
> convenience functions for constructing non-mixed GLMs.
> I will be taking a look soon and will report back!
> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 13:50 +0000, Douglas Bates wrote:
> > Has anyone tried https://github.com/bambinos/bambi for Bayesian
> > analysis of
> > mixed-effects models? It looks quite interesting.
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models