[R-sig-ME] Logistic modelling with guessing parameter
ken knoblauch
ken.knoblauch at inserm.fr
Fri May 8 16:28:41 CEST 2015
Peter Harrison <pharr011 at ...> writes:
>
> Hello Ben and Ken,
>
> Thanks very much for your useful responses!
>
> Ben - thanks for your hint re non-finite values in PIRLS, I'll bear that
in mind for the future. I added
> non-finite warning checks to the link functions etc. and nothing
came up this time, unfortunately.
>
> You're right, all of the groups show complete separation - I hadn't
thought too carefully about this but
> realise now that it will be a problem. I think I might have to merge the
musical tracks into larger groups,
> perhaps by metre, genre, etc.
>
> Thanks a lot for the great graph, too!
>
> Ken - thanks for the heads-up about using the link directly from
the psyphy package, that definitely
> simplifies things! Sorry, the code I gave and you ran is
an example that does work: responses ~ accuracy +
> (1|p_ID). The model I was having problems with
was when I added the "audio_name" predictor, i.e.
> responses ~ accuracy + audio_name + (1|p_ID).
Something that you can try is the mafc.cauchit link
that would impose a less steep slope because of
the heavy tails of the Cauchy. This might be less
sensitive to complete separation sort of like a
regularization of the psychometric function slope.
I have used this link to correct for the bias introduced
by lapses at the upper asymptote instead of introducing
a lapse parameter which is not obvious how to do
otherwise with glmer.
>
> Best wishes,
> Peter
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list