[R-sig-ME] Assessing Normality for Mixed Models

Farrar, David Farrar.David at epa.gov
Wed May 21 16:00:33 CEST 2014


There could be, of course, normality or otherwise at multiple levels of variation.  
Also I would think the importance of normality (versus perhaps just not too heavy-tailed?) could depend on the inferences one wants to make.
David


-----Original Message-----
From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Chris Howden
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:13 PM
To: AvianResearchDivision; r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] Assessing Normality for Mixed Models

They may not be addressing normality since we don’t always expect the residuals to be normal e.g. if we are doing a GLMM with a Poisson or binomial error distribution.

Chris Howden B.Sc. (Hons) GStat.
Founding Partner
Evidence Based Strategic Development, IP Commercialisation and Innovation, Data Analysis, Modelling and Training
(mobile) 0410 689 945
(skype) chris.howden
chris at trickysolutions.com.au




Disclaimer: The information in this email and any attachments to it are confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the named or intended recipient, please delete this communication and contact us immediately. Please note you are not authorised to copy, use or disclose this communication or any attachments without our consent.
Although this email has been checked by anti-virus software, there is a risk that email messages may be corrupted or infected by viruses or other interferences. No responsibility is accepted for such interference. Unless expressly stated, the views of the writer are not those of the company.
Tricky Solutions always does our best to provide accurate forecasts and analyses based on the data supplied, however it is possible that some important predictors were not included in the data sent to us. Information provided by us should not be solely relied upon when making decisions and clients should use their own judgement.


-----Original Message-----
From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org
[mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of AvianResearchDivision
Sent: Wednesday, 21 May 2014 4:59 AM
To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
Subject: [R-sig-ME] Assessing Normality for Mixed Models

Hi All,

After doing some extensive googling, searching for ways to assess normality for linear mixed models, I can honestly say my head is swimming in different proposed techniques that may or may not be valid.  Also, when reading the literature, I find that few studies that use linear mixed models and random regression actually explicitly address how they assess normality.  What are the rules with normality with mixed models (if there are any) and what are your techniques to assess normality?  Any input that you can provide would be great and hopefully we help to settle my mind on this issue.

Thank you,
Jacob

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models

_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models


More information about the R-sig-mixed-models mailing list