[R-sig-ME] nlme Fixed Variance Function
Ben Bolker
bbolker at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 22:24:34 CET 2012
Agostino Moro <agostino.moro99 at ...> writes:
>
> Dear R users,
>
> I am trying to fit a gls model and weight my data points using a
> VarFixed structure. I have found many examples, but I do not
> understand the difference between the following models with varFixed
> specified in a different way:
>
> mod<-gls(y~x,weights=varFixed(~1/invsigma)
>
> mod<-gls(y~x,weights=varFixed(~invsigma)
>
> In my case I would simply like to weigh my data points by their
> inverse variance.
>
It would be interesting to have links to examples that show
these two usages. One of them must be wrong, or at least weird.
Have you looked at ?varFixed? It says:
Letting v denote the variance covariate defined in ‘value’, the variance
function s2(v) for this class is s2(v)=|v|.
Thus if you know the variance _a priori_ is 'yvar' I think you want
weights=varFixed(~yvar) . This will set the variance to yvar and
hence weight by 1/yvar. (I'm using "yvar" rather than "sigma" or
"invsigma" because it's easy to get confused about whether "sigma"
represents variance or standard deviation ...)
I would strongly recommend using the 'data' argument: have x, y,
and yvar as columns in a data frame d and use
mod <- gls(y~x,weights=varFixed(~yvar),data=d)
Taking a look at Pinheiro and Bates 2000 would be a good idea.
If you're too cheap or in too much of a hurry to buy it, you can
search for "varFixed" within the book on Google books (see p. 209)
for a slightly more extended discussion of the admittedly terse
example in ?varFixed ...
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list