[R-sig-ME] problem fitting a mixed model due to between subjectvariation
David Duffy
davidD at qimr.edu.au
Thu Jul 29 01:47:02 CEST 2010
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, R.Donders at ebh.umcn.nl wrote:
> ... These are not my own
> data and the people who provided me with the data gave me a choice:
> either I could use their data but then it should be impossible to trace
> back to any content matter [...]
Hmph. So, should one expect autoregressive or order effects within each
subject across values of pred?
>
> Indeed from a graphical inspection (not as nice as yours) I also
> concluded that there really should not be any effect of pred for
> individual subjects. I thought that conclusion was even valid for
> clusters of all sizes.
Yes. I did this so there would be enough within-cluster data to
look at nonlinear effects. Specifically whether the curviness of loess
fits was systematic. I was thinking of the textbook examples of a
completely deterministic relationship with zero linear correlation.
> dropping unused levels (still don't know how to do that in one step)
[drop=T]
Just 2c, David.
| David Duffy (MBBS PhD) ,-_|\
| email: davidD at qimr.edu.au ph: INT+61+7+3362-0217 fax: -0101 / *
| Epidemiology Unit, Queensland Institute of Medical Research \_,-._/
| 300 Herston Rd, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia GPG 4D0B994A v
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list