[R-sig-ME] State of lme4

[Doran, Harold]

Out of curiousity, why not just use the asymptotic standards errors of
the fixed effects to get Cis rather than via simulation? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org 
> [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf 
> Of Jonathan Baron
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 8:05 AM
> To: Michael Kubovy
> Cc: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] State of lme4
> 
> On 07/10/08 07:51, Michael Kubovy wrote:
> > Dear Friends,
> > 
> > I have become confused as to which set-up of lme4, arm, 
> gmodels, etc 
> > will produce CIs on the fixed effects by simulation.
> 
> In the latest version of lme4, mcmcsamp and HPDinterval work. 
>  And languageR has a new version as of yesterday, which seems 
> to deal correctly with the current version of lme4.  
> Specifically, pvals.fnc() works.  I don't know about arm and 
> gmodels.  I haven't seen new versions, so I suspect they will 
> not deal with the new format of lmer.
> 
> Jon
> --
> Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of 
> Pennsylvania Home page: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron
> 
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list 
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
>