[R-meta] Hypothesis Testing of R2 in metafor

[Zhouhan Jin]

Thanks for the link regarding the CIs for R^2.

But my question was: can one, in principle, take the p-value used to test the null that all model coefs are zero to also serve as a null hypothesis test of R^2 being zero or there is a separate hypothesis test for R^2 (again in principle)?

In fact, is such a principle used in meta-analysis as I (think) it is used in regular regression (below)?

summary(lm(mpg ~ cyl, data= mtcars))$fstatistic

Best wishes,

Zhouhan
On May 28, 2024 at 06:32 -0400, Michael Dewey <lists using dewey.myzen.co.uk>, wrote:
[你通常不会收到来自 lists using dewey.myzen.co.uk 的电子邮件。请访问 https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification，以了解这一点为什么很重要]

Dear Zhouhan

Does https://www.metafor-project.org/doku.php/tips:ci_for_r2 help?

Michael

On 28/05/2024 04:34, Zhouhan Jin via R-sig-meta-analysis wrote:
Hello Colleagues,

My understanding is that it is common to report the p-value for the omnibus null hypothesis that all the coefficients in a model are zero, next to an R^2 value for an rma.mv()/rma() model.

If the above assumption is correct, then, should one also take that p-value to be a null hypothesis test of R^2 being zero or there is a separate test for R^2?

Thanks in advance.

Best wishes,

Zhouhan


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list @ R-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
To manage your subscription to this mailing list, go to:
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis


--
Michael

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]