[R-meta] Question on: models results extracted to tables by a function

Gabriel Cotlier g@b|k|m01 @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Sat Jul 1 08:15:03 CEST 2023


Hello Reza,

Your advice was indeed very helpful.
Regarding the fancy table presentation I found the "flextable" package that
I think might do the job -- very similar to those iptables in Jamovi
--using  the input to flextable as you described in the link you provided.
Kind regards,
Gabriel



On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 9:44 PM Gabriel Cotlier <gabiklm01 using gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Reza,
> Thank you very much for your clear and concise answer.
> I also appreciate the guidance and advice you provided.
> I will go over the information and link you mentioned.
> Indeed will be of great help.
> Thank you again.
> Kind regards,
> Gabriel
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 9:34 PM Reza Norouzian <rnorouzian using gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Gabriel,
>>
>> In short, no such function currently exists in metafor, partly
>> because there is quite a bit of flexibility in models fit by rma.mv.
>>
>> By contrast, standard random-effects models, like the one you're showing,
>> have far less flexibility in their specifications leading to a much more
>> uniform output. Given this uniformity, metafor offers the reporter.rma.uni()
>> function which generates essentially a report-type output that you can edit
>> and use for publication purposes.
>>
>> A question similar to yours regarding rma.mv recently came up on the
>> list (
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/2023-June/004737.html).
>> You can pretty much reconstruct your tables (except the last one) using the
>> quantities discussed there.
>>
>> Regarding your last table, you can use: t(fitstats(your_model)). However,
>> if you necessarily want the log-likelihood from both the max. likelihood
>> and restricted max. likelihood methods for the same model, then, you'll
>> need to fit your model twice, each time setting the "method=" argument in
>> your rma.mv call to one of those two methods.
>>
>> You can also search the metafor's online resources or the listserv's
>> archives for any other quantities (e.g., I^2) that you like to form your
>> desired table(s).
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Reza
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 9:21 AM Gabriel Cotlier via R-sig-meta-analysis <
>> r-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I would like to ask if there is a  function or way that enables to
>>> obtain from R the model results for objects class "rma.mv"  as fancy
>>> table  such as like that obtained from Jamovi -MAJOR ourpout  for
>>> objects class "rma":
>>>
>>> [image: image.png]
>>>
>>> [image: image.png]
>>>
>>>
>>> As well as function that enable to automatically perform the comparison
>>> between Maximum-likelihood and restricted Maximum-likelihood :
>>>
>>> [image: image.png]
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot.
>>> Kid regards,
>>> Gabriel
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list @ R-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
>>> To manage your subscription to this mailing list, go to:
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis
>>>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20230701/19a73dd3/attachment-0001.html>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 39703 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20230701/19a73dd3/attachment-0003.png>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 28119 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20230701/19a73dd3/attachment-0004.png>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 42764 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20230701/19a73dd3/attachment-0005.png>


More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list