[R-meta] N of trials or participants?

Patrizio E Tressoldi p@tr|z|o@tre@@o|d| @end|ng |rom un|pd@|t
Wed Feb 1 07:58:22 CET 2023


Il 31/01/2023 21:51, Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP)wrote:
> Dear Patrizio,
>
> I don't really understand your question. With 'standardized effect sizes estimation', do you mean the calculation of an effect size like a standardized mean difference? If so, that is done for a trial/study, so how would the number of trials ever be relevant for this?
>
Yes, I mean a standardized mean difference or a difference between 
proportions. In many studies, participants' results are based on a 
different number of trials.

Patrizio


Subject: [R-meta] N of trials or participants?

When and how is it possible to use N of trials instead of N of

participants in the standardized effect sizes estimation?

It is likely that this question already had a response. In this case,

please send me links or references.

Thanks




-- 
Patrizio E. Tressoldi Ph.D.
Science of Consciousness Research Group
Studium Patavinum
Università di Padova
Padova - ITALY
http://www.patriziotressoldi.it  
https://socrg.org
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6404-0058
https://opensciences.org/about/manifesto-for-a-post-materialist-science

Make war history
supporthttps://en.emergency.it  

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list