[R-meta] Meta-Analysis and Forest Plot for Multiple Treatments and Outcomes
Dr. Gerta Rücker
ruecker @end|ng |rom |mb|@un|-|re|burg@de
Mon Jan 31 19:34:20 CET 2022
First of all, if I understand it correctly, what you are aiming at is a
network meta-analysis (NMA). Therefore, meta is not the appropriate R
package, which would be netmeta (specialized to NMA) or metafor (more
general). It seems you have in fact used netmeta, because you write
about a netmeta object, is that true? I would see the NMA as the primary
analysis and the pairwise meta-analyses as sensitivity analyses. These
can be conducted using function netpairwise() in netmeta; for the fixed
effect model, also netsplit() should provide the direct pairwise
comparisons. Perhaps @Guido Schwarzer sees a convenient way to visualize
the results within the same forest plot using forest.netsplit().
I would expect a problem with Hedges' g for three-arm studies because
the results within a trial may become inconsistent (this holds for
Hedges' g, but not for Cohen's d, as implemented in netmeta).
Note that netmeta accounts for multiple comparisons between groups with
a study, however, it does not handle multivariate outcomes. Thus, if you
want to account for correlation between outcomes, you need metafor. With
respect to metafor, others are more expert than me.
Am 31.01.2022 um 19:02 schrieb Ruth Appel:
> Hi all,
> I’m currently conducting my first meta-analysis, an internal meta-analysis to summarize the result of 3 similar studies my colleagues and I conducted.
> I looked at the documentation of various meta-analysis packages and tutorials, but I am still not fully sure about the best approach.
> The experiments I’m analyzing all have a similar structure (2 treatment groups, 1 control group; 8 different outcomes (measuring different constructs)). The raw data has repeated measures, but we look at outcomes at the group level, so I calculated all necessary summary statistics (mean, sd, n).
> My goal is to create a forest plot that shows Hedges’ g estimated using an FE model (because the studies were highly similar) for (1) all 3 studies individually and (2) across all studies. Ideally, the final result would be a single forest plot with individual study estimates and across study estimate grouped by outcome.
> I managed to create such a plot with the meta package for the 2 treatment groups separately, but I realized that my SEs could be biased in this case because I’m not accounting for the correlations in the variance resulting from the comparison of two treatment groups to the same control group. Similarly, I found a workaround to show all outcomes in 1 forest plot by using subgroups for the different outcomes, but I do not take into consideration that outcomes might be correlated within studies. I also didn’t find a way to show the individual study results in addition to the overall network results in a forest plot of a netmeta object.
> I then tried to calculate the correct values using metafor and following the tutorial at https://www.metafor-project.org/doku.php/analyses:gleser2009#multiple-treatment_studies, but it seems like the individual studies are not correctly identified in the output (the ids are all unique instead of matching the study variable I had created).
> My questions are: (1) Did I overlook guidance somewhere on how to exactly specify a model like the one above using the metafor, meta (or another R) package, and generate a forest plot for it?
> (2) If this is not easily possible, do you think the bias introduced should be sufficiently small such that acknowledging it and presenting separate meta-analyses for each treatment, and a network meta analysis with the overall effects of each treatment (separately for each outcome) in the appendix, is acceptable? (I had very similar estimates across all the approaches described above.)
> Best regards, and thank you very much for your guidance,
> Ruth Elisabeth Appel
> Ph.D. Candidate in Media Psychology
> Stanford University Department of Communication
> rappel using stanford.edu
> R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list
> R-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
Dr. rer. nat. Gerta Rücker, Dipl.-Math.
Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics,
Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg
Zinkmattenstr. 6a, D-79108 Freiburg, Germany
Mail: ruecker using imbi.uni-freiburg.de
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis