[R-meta] Unusual problem with metafor:rma output
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
wo||g@ng@v|echtb@uer @end|ng |rom m@@@tr|chtun|ver@|ty@n|
Thu Jul 9 15:47:14 CEST 2020
See help(confint.rma.uni) and see the 'Details' section.
>From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces using r-project.org]
>On Behalf Of Simonson, Richard J.
>Sent: Thursday, 09 July, 2020 15:36
>To: r-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
>Subject: [R-meta] Unusual problem with metafor:rma output
>I have a rather unusual problem with the output of my metaregression using
>When I attempt to calculate the confidence intervals for the tau, I, and H
>values, all of the estimates are lower than the lower 95% confidence
> estimate ci.lb ci.ub
>tau^2 0.8002 1.8334 7.8651
>tau 0.9125 1.456 2.7222
>I^2(%) 92.455 95.157 99.3356
>H^2 11.5454 24.2385 90.6577
>The code I used for the random effects meta-regression is:
>res <- rma(yi = LogOdds, sei = SE, data = data, method = 'DL')
>After playing around with the code, I discovered that if I change the method
>to method = "SJ", this problem is eliminated but increases all heterogeneity
>I'm guessing this has to do with how these parameters are being estimated.
>But why was this happening in the first place?
>Has anyone encountered this before?
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis