[R-meta] Conducting IPD meta-analysis [R]
Röver, Christian
chr|@t|@n@roever @end|ng |rom med@un|-goett|ngen@de
Sat Dec 5 16:13:34 CET 2020
Dear Sam,
for IPD meta-analysis, you may in fact need to check out generic
software for mixed models (rather than dedicated meta-analysis
software).
I am currently working on a (Bayesian) IPD meta-analysis, and we are
using the "brms" package (https://cran.r-project.org/package=brms).
For a frequentist analysis, I guess the "lme4", "nlme" or similar
packages may be useful.
Cheers,
Christian
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 13:26 +0000, Michael Dewey wrote:
> Dear Sam
>
> There are more than 100 packages for meta-analysis listed in the
> relevant CRAN Task View https://cran.r-project.org/view=MetaAnalysis
>
> Without more details about what the output from your first stage is
> likely to look like it is hard to recommend the best option but the
> two
> general purpose packages which most people use are meta and metafor.
> The
> authors of both of these monitor this list if you have detailed
> queries.
>
> Michael
>
> On 02/12/2020 19:13, Sam Meyler wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am aiming to undertake a ‘two-stage’ IPD meta-analysis using R
> > and was
> > wondering if you could recommend the most appropriate package to
> > use?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Sam
> >
> > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>
> > for
> > Windows 10
> >
> >
> > <
> > http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> >
> > Virus-free. www.avg.com
> > <
> > http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> >
> >
> >
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list
> > R-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis
> >
>
>
More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis
mailing list