[R-meta] Conducting IPD meta-analysis [R]

Röver, Christian chr|@t|@n@roever @end|ng |rom med@un|-goett|ngen@de
Sat Dec 5 16:13:34 CET 2020


Dear Sam,

for IPD meta-analysis, you may in fact need to check out generic
software for mixed models (rather than dedicated meta-analysis
software).

I am currently working on a (Bayesian) IPD meta-analysis, and we are
using the "brms" package (https://cran.r-project.org/package=brms).

For a frequentist analysis, I guess the "lme4", "nlme" or similar
packages may be useful.

Cheers,

Christian


On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 13:26 +0000, Michael Dewey wrote:
> Dear Sam
> 
> There are more than 100 packages for meta-analysis listed in the 
> relevant CRAN Task View https://cran.r-project.org/view=MetaAnalysis
> 
> Without more details about what the output from your first stage is 
> likely to look like it is hard to recommend the best option but the
> two 
> general purpose packages which most people use are meta and metafor.
> The 
> authors of both of these monitor this list if you have detailed
> queries.
> 
> Michael
> 
> On 02/12/2020 19:13, Sam Meyler wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > I am aiming to undertake a ‘two-stage’ IPD meta-analysis using R
> > and was 
> > wondering if you could recommend the most appropriate package to
> > use?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Sam
> > 
> > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>
> > for 
> > Windows 10
> > 
> > 
> > <
> > http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> >  
> > 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
> > <
> > http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list
> > R-sig-meta-analysis using r-project.org
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis
> > 
> 
> 


More information about the R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list