Dr Eberhard W Lisse
e| @end|ng |rom ||@@e@NA
Thu Apr 2 14:27:58 CEST 2020
Argument for homebrew:
which will figure out what needs to be upgraded so I don't have
manually keep track of it.
BTW, it usually pulls the binary, and these have worked without any
issues for many years, the last time something went wrong on the
Download and it pulled the source. I don't care either way.
Packages must be installed from source, but not as source. R will look
for the package on CRAN like any other and usually takes the binary,
sometimes asking whether it should take a (newer) source )of the
The first run of (re-)installing additional packages does indeed take
some time, but it doesn't happen often.
The point is that there is a channel for issues with homebrew packages
but few people (especially when desperate) will take the time :-)-O
02/04/2020 13:09, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> On 2 Apr 2020, at 12:56, Hervé Pagès <hpages using fredhutch.org> wrote:
>> Just for a minute let's ignore the fact that installing R via
>> Homebrew is not considered a good option by the competent authorities
>> (which sounds like a good enough reason to stay away from it). I'm
>> still wondering: what's the benefit vs installing the official CRAN
>> binary? Just curious.
> Arguments against homebrew:
> Not an official response, but in the past, homebrew was compiling
> everything on the local machine. This is not the case anymore, and
> the default installation in homebrew, installs a binary.
> All packages need to be installed from source. This takes time, but I
> had no problems with any of the packages I use.
> Just some tidbits from previous discussions.
> But I would like to also hear the official reason (no resources would
> be a good enough justification as well).
> Arguments for homebrew:
> it is more Linux like, in the way that you have more control over the
> tools used. e.g. when still using the official R installation, I
> regularly used different versions of GDAL in R, GRASS, …, which can
> cause inconsistencies.
> The installation is done without requiring root privileges, which is a
> big advantage (as I see it).
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
el using lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ / If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
Bachbrecht 10007, Namibia ;____/ Section 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply
More information about the R-SIG-Mac