[R-SIG-Mac] R 3.2.0 Mavericks/Yosemite: help.search showing error

Simon Urbanek simon.urbanek at r-project.org
Mon Jun 15 03:38:32 CEST 2015


Note that the build failed - this means that there is no actual way to determine the version (since R can't be run). I think what happens is that the currently installed version is then reported which is whatever did succeed last - in this case 3.2.1 RC. The bug here is that nothing (other that the error) should have been reported.

Cheers,
Simon


On Jun 14, 2015, at 3:26 PM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
>> On 14 Jun 2015, at 20:26 , Berend Hasselman <bhh at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> It says R-devel version 3.2.1 RC. Development version.
>> Wouldn’t/Shouldn't that be 3.3.0  especially since it is trying to find resources for 3.3.0?
>> 
>> I’m using R-3.2-branch: version 3.2.1 RC.
>> which is the upcoming R 3.2.1 AFAICT and I have assumed.
>> 
>> Berend
> 
> Yes, that is the way it is supposed to work. 3-2-branch moves through the sequence 
> 
> 3.2.0 alpha
> 3.2.0 beta
> 3.2.0 RC
> 3.2.0 
> 3.2.0 Patched
> 3.2.1 beta
> 3.2.1 RC
> 3.2.1
> 3.2.1 Patched
> <etc>
> 
> whereas R-devel should stick at
> 
> 3.3.0 Under development (unstable)
> 
> until it is time for 3-3-branch, at which point it changes to 3.4.0 Under development, etc.
> 
> How R-devel ended up listing as 3.2.1 RC is hard to tell, but presumably it is a local error at r.research.att.com (there seems to be no issue with the present sources in SVN).
> 
> Notice that 3.2.0 Patched disappears when 3.2.1 prereleases start. There seems to be no backlog of builds of 3.2.0 Patched, but there would be little point in looking for one. 3.2.1 is really just a formal release of patches-to-date.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
> Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
> Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
> Phone: (+45)38153501
> Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk  Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



More information about the R-SIG-Mac mailing list