[R-SIG-Mac] [R] 64-bit OSX binary for 2.9.2

[Loren Engrav]

Thank you

5426s fail but 5455s work
So with 
R-2.9-branch-leopard-universal.tar.gz from http://r.research.att.com/
And then sudo tar...
And 
R.app from
http://r.research.att.com/R-GUI-5455-2.9-leopard-Leopard64.dmg or 32
I seem to have 32 and 64 2.9.2, cool

My sessionInfo at startup on this MacBook is ...

R version 2.9.2 Patched (2009-09-05 r49613)
i386-apple-darwin9.8.0

locale:
en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base

-- 
Loren Engrav, MD
Professor and Chief, Plastic Surgery, 1977-2001
Associate Director, Burn Center, 1977-2001
Univ Washington
Seattle



> From: David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net>
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:28:51 -0400
> To: David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net>
> Cc: Loren Engrav <engrav at u.washington.edu>, "r-sig-mac at stat.math.ethz.ch"
> <r-sig-mac at stat.math.ethz.ch>
> Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [R] 64-bit OSX binary for 2.9.2
> 
> 
> On Sep 14, 2009, at 7:08 PM, David Winsemius wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Sep 14, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Loren Engrav wrote:
>> 
>> snipped
>>> 
>>> 3-R.app available at http://r.research.att.com/ is 5426 but 5455 32
>>> and 64
>>> bit available at
>>> http://r.research.att.com/R-GUI-5455-2.9-leopard-Leopard.dmg as per
>>> 8/6/09
>>> r-sig-mac discussion so I put in 5455; but why 5426 here and 5455
>>> there?
>> 
>> Can't help you there. I have the 2.9.0 GUI [R.app GUI 1.29 (5463)
>> x86_64-apple-darwin9.7.0] running with the R 2.9.1 Patched and am
>> not having noticeable difficulties. My guess is that the "right" way
>> to do this would be to use 5426 with R 2.9.2
> 
> And my guess appears to be wrong. I installed the current R-2.9-branch-
> leopard-universal.tar.gz using Lianglou's confrmation of my suggestion
> that sudo might need to prefix the ta command. Also downloaded the Mac
> OS X GUI rev. 5426 for R 2.1.xleopard-Leopard64.dmg file and dragged
> the R.app file to another loaction, renamed it R64new,app, and dragged
> it to the Applications folder. That GUI crashes while the old one
> launches R just fine. My newly installed R says it is R version 2.9.1
> Patched (2009-07-04 r48897) but I seem to remember Urbanek saying that
> is misleading and that it really is 2.9.2
>> 
>> Note to web page maintainer. The labels on the R-GUI's must be
>> wrong, they say "R 2.1.x". Is that supposed to say R 2.9.x and 2.10.x?
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> 
>>> Loren Engrav, MD
>>> U Washington
> snipped
> 
> David Winsemius, MD
> Heritage Laboratories
> West Hartford, CT
>