[R-SIG-Mac] Permissions still not quite right
simon.urbanek at math.uni-augsburg.de
Sat Nov 20 00:53:00 CET 2004
On Nov 19, 2004, at 7:34 PM, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> The 2.0.1 installer is much better about permissions than versions
> before 2.0,
1.9.x didn't use Apple installer (except for the looks) - it actually
untarred a tar ball - bad boy. The current one (2.0.0 and 2.0.1) are
totally different specified from scratch, using PM.
> but it still changed the owner of /Applications:
> User differs on ./Applications, should be 0, owner is 502
> Owner and group corrected on ./Applications
> Permissions corrected on ./Applications
> It really should leave the owners and permissions of existing
> directories alone.
Well, our packages tell Apple Installer to leave them alone. It seems
to be a bug in Apple Installer, because from
so it shouldn't replace any existing rights. I'm pretty much at loss,
because no package contains the Applications folder and R-GUI uses 0:80
as owner:group - and it's respected as you can see:
Miraculix:~% ls -ld /Applications/R.app
drwxrwxr-x 3 root admin 102 20 Nov 00:42 /Applications/R.app
In fact UID 502 is not used anywhere in any package of the R installer.
Is your UID on that machine 502?
We could work around it by changing the rights in post-flight but we
instructed AI to not change them in the first place ...
Department of computer oriented statistics and data analysis
Simon.Urbanek at Math.Uni-Augsburg.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 1796 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mac/attachments/20041120/d2327a45/attachment.bin
More information about the R-SIG-Mac