[R-SIG-Mac] Installing Bioconductor 1.5 on R 2.0 for OS X
Michael Redmond
redmond at stat.wisc.edu
Mon Nov 8 23:21:19 CET 2004
Byron,
I have been having some success with R installation by replacing the
fink version of g77 with the sourceforge version. So thanks very much
for that info.
Now that I have a good R base system compiled on OS X (I am trying both
on a Powerbook for testing and on the XServe), I have been trying to
load bioconductor to test compile with the sourceforge g77, but with no
success over the last week. Something seems to have changed, since I was
able to get further along before then.
On the Powebook, I do the standard connect to
http://www.bioconductor.org/getBioC.R and the do the getBioC(). It spins
for a few seconds, then gives an error message "Error in getBioC()" but
with no additional diagnostic information. This is the same if I ask for
default or specific packages. I also tried "verbose = TRUE" and got no
additional info. When I try on the XServe, I get an error message "Error
in file(file, "wb") : unable to open connection".
I am sure that I wasn't getting these messages when I first tried
loading bioconductor to the XServe.
Any idea of what is up?
Thanks
Mike Redmond
UW-Madison
---
Byron Ellis wrote:
>
> On Nov 2, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Michael Redmond wrote:
>
>> I have a working version of R 2.0 with option packages installed on
>> an OS X 10.3.5 system. Option packages were installed with
>> install.binaries option and that seemed to work. Install using
>> sources failed.
>>
>> I tried installing bioconductor from sources and got mixed results
>> (at best). Some packages failed to install (annotate, graph,
>> Rgraphviz and maybe XML and possibly others). I also need to install
>> arrayCGH to get DNAcopy. That uses the g77 compiler and failes with a
>> mismatch of gcc library versions. I have g77 from fink.
>
>
> You want the g77 from http://hpc.sourceforge.net---the fink g77 has
> never worked properly for me (actually, thats a general statement
> about fink for me :-) )
>
>>
>> Is there a install.binary option for bioconductor and some of the
>> bioconductor contributed packages (specifically arrayCGH)? If not
>> now, when (if ever). If never, I may need some help to fix compile
>> errors trying from source.
>>
>
> Jan De Leeuw usually wraps up the latest Bioconductor release into his
> "Batteries Included" version of R. I don't think there's a dedicated
> OS X machine doing binary builds anymore (IIRC, there used to be one
> doing the nightly smoke test). Unfortunately, OS X is probably the
> most finicky platform at the moment as well for that reason.
>
>> I am working on this for an Apple 4 node XServe to see if it can be
>> used under the iNquiry portal for R/Bioconductor applications.
>
>
> Ooh! Could you ping me off list about how thats working out for you?
> Our group has been considering one to serve some of internal
> computational needs---we're mostly curious about how much
> administration and configuration it requires. (i.e., do you just turn
> it on and go?)
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mike Redmond
>> UW-Madison Statistics
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> R-SIG-Mac mailing list
>> R-SIG-Mac at stat.math.ethz.ch
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
>>
> ---
> Byron Ellis (ellis at stat.harvard.edu)
> "Oook" -- The Librarian
More information about the R-SIG-Mac
mailing list