[R-sig-Geo] sp/rgdal workflows with PROJ >= 6 and GDAL >= 3
Lorenzo Busetto
|bu@ett @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Fri Nov 29 18:30:02 CET 2019
Dear Roger,
I'd be very interested in participating to the stream talk. Is it
confirmed?
Concerning testing the connection, I'd be happy to do it but I do not know
how much I will be available online in the coming days. You can drop me a
mail/DM on twitter, and if I am available I'll gladly help.
Concerning technology, Zoom usually works quite well (https://zoom.us/
<https://zoom.us/ent?zcid=3172>)
regards,
Lorenzo
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 13:04, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand using nhh.no> wrote:
> A description of the status now with regard to a prototype resolution is
> online at:
>
> https://rsbivand.github.io/ECS530_h19/ECS530_III.html
>
> I'm planning to stream a talk about this at 09:15-11:00 CET on Tuesday 3
> December. I need a volunteer to test the streaming link in advance during
> next week. I'm unsure which technology to use for remote participants to
> provide feedback.
>
> Contributions/comments welcome!
>
> Roger
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Roger Bivand wrote:
>
> > The development version of rgdal on R-Forge is now at rev 894, and is
> now
> > ready for trying out with PROJ6/GDAL3 workflows, and workflows that may
> > migrate within 6 months to modern CRS representations. The motivating
> RFC is
> > also updated to cover coordinate operations, the use of prepared
> > (pre-searched) coordinate operations, and should be read carefully by
> anyone
> > using rgdal::spTransform(). Note further that rgdal::project() will not
> be
> > adapted for PROJ6, and is effectively deprecated.
> >
> > I'll be running reverse dependency checks, and may be bugging package
> > maintainers. I would really prefer that mainainers of packages using
> > spTransform() checked themselves and joined this thread or the
> associated
> > twitter thread:
> https://twitter.com/RogerBivand/status/1194586193108914177
> >
> > Be ready for modern PROJ and GDAL, they are already being deployed
> across
> > open source geospatial software, like GRASS, QGIS, pyproj, spatialite
> etc.
> >
> > Waiting, hopefully not in vain, for contributions.
> >
> > Roger
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Roger Bivand wrote:
> >
> >> And this link explains the CDN proposal for grid distribution:
> >>
> >> https://www.spatialys.com/en/crowdfunding/
> >>
> >> Roger
> >>
> >> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Roger Bivand wrote:
> >>
> >>> Because PROJ >= 6 and GDAL >= 3 change the way that PROJ strings
> >>> (representations of coordinate reference systems) are handled, steps
> are
> >>> being taken to find ways to adapt sp/rgdal workflows. A current
> proposal
> >>> is to store the WKT2_2018 string as a comment to CRS objects as
> defined
> >>> in
> >>> the sp package.
> >>>
> >>> A draft development-in-progress version of rgdal is available at
> >>> https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=884, and for sp at
> >>> https://github.com/rsbivand/sp (this version of sp requires rgdal >=
> >>> 1.5-1). This adds the WKT comments to CRS objects on reading vector
> and
> >>> raster data sources, and uses WKT comments if found when writing
> vector
> >>> and raster objects (or at least does as far as I've checked, possibly
> >>> fragile).
> >>>
> >>> An RFC with tersely worked cases for using CRS object comments to
> carry
> >>> WKT strings but maintaining full backward compatibility is online at
> >>> http://rgdal.r-forge.r-project.org/articles/PROJ6_GDAL3.html.
> >>>
> >>> If you have other ideas or concerns about trying to use this
> mechanism
> >>> for
> >>> sp CRS objects, please contribute at your earliest convenience.
> >>>
> >>> http://rgdal.r-forge.r-project.org/reference/list_coordOps.html
> shows
> >>> the
> >>> beginning of the next step, to query transformation operations to
> find
> >>> viable coordinate operation pipelines.
> >>>
> >>> I'm assuming that the previous behaviour (transform without
> considering
> >>> accuracy with whatever is to hand) is not viable going forward, and
> that
> >>> we will need two steps: list coordinate operations between source and
> >>> target CRS (using the WKT comments as better specifications than the
> >>> PROJ
> >>> strings), possibly intervene manually to install missing grids, then
> >>> undertake the coordinate operation.
> >>>
> >>> The fallback may be simply to choose the least inaccurate available
> >>> coordinate operation, but this should be a fallback. This means that
> all
> >>> uses of spTransform() will require intervention.
> >>>
> >>> Is this OK (it is tiresome but modernises workflows once), or is it
> not
> >>> OK
> >>> (no user intervention is crucial)?
> >>>
> >>> These behaviours may be set in an option, so that package maintainers
> >>> and
> >>> users may delay modernisation, but all are undoubtedly served by
> rapid
> >>> adaptation (GRASS 7.8.1 released yesterday, libspatialite, pyproj,
> QGIS
> >>> development versions all state that they list candidate coordinate
> >>> operations).
> >>>
> >>> We cannot ship all the grids, they are very bulky, and probably
> nobody
> >>> needs sub-metre accuracy world-wide. Work in PROJ is starting to
> create
> >>> a
> >>> content delivery network for trusted download and mechanisms for
> >>> registering downloaded grids on user platforms. We would for example
> not
> >>> want Windows users of rgdal and sf to have to download the same grid
> >>> twice.
> >>>
> >>> Comments welcome here and at
> >>> https://github.com/r-spatial/discuss/issues/28 or
> >>> https://github.com/r-spatial/sf/issues/1187
> >>>
> >>> Roger
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Roger Bivand
> Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics,
> Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway.
> voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: Roger.Bivand using nhh.no
> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140
> https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-Geo mailing list
> R-sig-Geo using r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-Geo
mailing list