[R-sig-Geo] Transform hexagonal to raster - a wife's question
chris english
engli@hchri@topher@ @ending from gm@il@com
Mon Jul 30 19:25:30 CEST 2018
Sarah,
I'll try the R-geo approach suggested for a small, sought after kokopeli,
and duck an integrated raster colorizer (five years to proto-type given my
skills.) I've forwarded all this to Dr Massa. I would say though that things
'loom' tend to work both for fabric and bead. Glad you checked the thread.
Happy summer,
Chris
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Sarah Goslee <sarah.goslee using gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I nearly didn't open this email thread: glad I did!
>
> I have some odd R tools for weaving, but nothing for beading.
>
> I suspect this is the best way to do it, although the actual result
> would depend on the particular pattern.
>
> http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art61406.asp
>
> Whether it's worth writing R code to perform this task depends a lot
> on how many patterns need to be converted.
>
> A more R-geo approach might be to import the original pattern from an
> image file, turn it into spatial polygons, then rasterize it,
> completely ignoring the hexagonal nature of the original. With some
> playing with the raster grid size, you could probably get a decent
> approximation.
>
> Sarah
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:40 AM, chris english
> <englishchristophera using gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you Ben!, I'll actually send her directly
> > to Sarah, http://www.sarahgoslee.com/ .
> > Dr. Massa, meet Dr. Goslee, Professor of indeterminate studies & weaver,
> > and writer,
> > Dr. Goslee, meet Dr. Massa, cognitive neuro research scientist, felter
> and
> > loom beader.
> > Thanks again,
> > Chris
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Ben Tupper <btupper using bigelow.org> wrote:
> >
> >> If I were in your shoes I would be doing a hop-skip to ring Sarah
> Goslee's
> >> doorbell. She's our resident ecology-spatial-textiles guru...
> >>
> >> http://www.stringpage.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 29, 2018, at 12:26 AM, chris english <
> englishchristophera using gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> My wife showed me a beading pattern that she was working on that looks
> to
> >> my eye like a hexagonal grid, its called a peyote stitch, and she needs
> to
> >> transform it to a loom stitch, essentially a raster. In the beading
> world
> >> they suggest combining two rows into one. If asked, what have you
> tried, I
> >> would say I tried to duck, but... In practical application, the two rows
> >> equals one doesn't appear to preserve the desired pattern when beading
> the
> >> loom, probably something like netting out the half-steps when you're
> going
> >> from two rows to one = n+1 or n +2 for bead count on the combined row.
> >> 40x40 hex grid, OK, I'll get out my graph paper. Summer.
> >>
> >> Thank you for your forbearance, and any very general thoughts
> appreciated,
> >> ie transforms sans datums & etc.
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-sig-Geo
mailing list