[R-sig-Geo] removing internal boundaries from a spatstat window that was created from three adjacent counties
r.turner at auckland.ac.nz
Mon Feb 15 23:03:26 CET 2016
On 13/02/16 11:59, Christopher W. Ryan wrote:
> In spatstat, I want to create a single window from three adjacent
> counties in New York State, USA. My original data is a shapefile,
> "cty036" showing all the New York State county boundaries. Here's what
> I've done so far:
> ========== begin code =========
> nysArea <- readOGR("C:/DATA/GeographicData", "cty036")
> nysAreaUTM <- spTransform(nysArea, CRS("+proj=utm +zone=18 +ellps=GRS80
> +units=m +no_defs"))
> sremsAreaUTM <- subset(nysAreaUTM, NAME=="Broome" | NAME=="Tioga" |
> sremsWindow <- as(sremsAreaUTM, "owin")
> ======== end code =============
> This works pretty well, producing a 3-county owin object. But the
> dividing lines between the counties are shown in the window, whenever I
> plot it or plot subsequent point patterns that use the window. In
> essence, in plots it looks like 3 polygons instead of one big one. I'd
> prefer not to have the inter-county boundaries be visible--I'd rather
> have just one big polygon for the whole area. How can I remove them? Or
> should I create the window differently from the get-go?
I think it probable that your owin object has come out as a multiple
polygon. Look at length(sremsWindow$bdry) --- this is probably 3 (or more).
I would guess that the internal boundaries actually consist of *pairs*
of closely juxtaposed lines --- which look like single lines when plotted.
Have you read the spatstat vignette "shapefiles"? That might give you
some guidance as to how to proceed.
I would have thought the automatic repair process that spatstat now uses
would fix up this problem. What version of spatstat are you using?
You *might* be able to fix things up by doing (something like):
W1 <- owin(poly=sremsWindow$bdry[])
W2 <- owin(poly=sremsWindow$bdry[])
W3 <- owin(poly=sremsWindow$bdry[])
W <- union.owin(W1,W2,W3)
But if my guess about the internal boundaries actually being pairs of
line is correct, this may not work.
It's hard to say without having your sremsWindow object to experiment on.
Or perhaps you need to extract the three counties separately as owin
objects and the apply union.owin() to the three results. (Again, if my
guess is correct, this may not work.)
Adrian or Ege may be able to propose a more efficient/effective solution.
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
More information about the R-sig-Geo