[R-sig-Geo] gdalwarp gives different cellsize when re-projected
Swagath
swagathnavin82 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 7 22:14:47 CET 2013
Hello,
Thank you very much for your reply. After some careful reading about
GDAL i was able to change the resolution once i re-projected the grid.
i used the following command
gdalwarp outfile2.tif outfile3.tif -tr 0.05 0.05
outfile2.tif-0.065 resolution
outfile3.tif-0.05 resolution
Thanks,
Navin
On 3/7/13 2:52 PM, Alexandre Villers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Well, given you went from a projected to a geographic coordinates
> system, you changed the unit of the grid from meters to degrees.
> So I wouldn't be surprised and I guess nothing went wrong as long you
> specified the correct EPSG for your original file.
>
> HTH
>
> Alex
>
> On 07/03/2013 15:29, Swagath Navin wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have a large data-frame with Lon, Lat , Value . Coordinates
>> projected in EPSG:3035 with a resolution of 5 kmx5 km. I converted
>> this into a SGDF. My goal was to project the file into EPSG:4326 with
>> a resolution of 0.05. For re-projecting i converted the file to tif
>> using
>>
>> writeGDAL(df, "file.tif")
>>
>> and used the gdalwarp
>>
>> gdalwarp file.tif outfile.tif -t_srs "+init=epsg:4326"
>>
>> However while comparing both files the cell size is different.
>>
>> getGridTopology(file1)
>> x y
>> cellcentre.offset 2638500 1430500
>> cellsize 5000 5000
>> cells.dim 664 797
>> projargs: chr " +proj=laea +lat_0=52 +lon_0=10 +x_0=4321000
>> +y_0=3210000 +ellps=GRS80 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs"
>>
>> getGridTopology(file2)
>> x y
>> cellcentre.offset -31.31150705 34.11186136
>> cellsize 0.06515996 0.06515996
>> cells.dim 1254.00000000 580.00000000
>>
>> projargs: chr " +proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs +ellps=WGS84
>> +towgs84=0,0,0"
>>
>> Can anyone please tell me where it went wrong.
>>
>> Thanks for your time.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> R-sig-Geo mailing list
>> R-sig-Geo at r-project.org
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the R-sig-Geo
mailing list