[R-sig-Geo] R-sig-Geo Digest, Vol 84, Issue 18

David Méndez evion12000 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 18 13:08:26 CEST 2010



Enviado desde mi HTC

----- Mensaje original -----
De: r-sig-geo-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
Enviado: Miércoles, 18 de Agosto de 2010 05:30 a.m.
Para: r-sig-geo at stat.math.ethz.ch
Asunto: R-sig-Geo Digest, Vol 84, Issue 18

Send R-sig-Geo mailing list submissions to
	r-sig-geo at stat.math.ethz.ch

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	r-sig-geo-request at stat.math.ethz.ch

You can reach the person managing the list at
	r-sig-geo-owner at stat.math.ethz.ch

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of R-sig-Geo digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: lagsarlm with simulated data (Malcolm Fairbrother)
   2. spRbind for spplot (Klaus Vormoor)
   3. Temporal marked point process with time-varying	covariates
      (Mayeul KAUFFMANN)
   4. Re: Best distance for a semi-variogram calculation (Scionforbai)
   5. Re: lagsarlm with simulated data (Roger Bivand)
   6. Re: spRbind for spplot (Paul Hiemstra)
   7. Re: Temporal marked point process with time-varying
      covariates (Roger Bivand)
   8. Re: spRbind for spplot (Klaus Vormoor)
   9. Re: spRbind for spplot (Paul Hiemstra)
  10. Spatial data tower of babel (Barry Rowlingson)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:37:54 +0100
From: Malcolm Fairbrother <m.fairbrother at bristol.ac.uk>
To: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no
Cc: r-sig-geo at stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] lagsarlm with simulated data
Message-ID: <7329C44A-01D0-4BB2-A980-4C7366F85C4F at bristol.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear Roger (and any other interested parties),

Thanks very much for responding. I tried adding the scale() argument you suggested, but that didn't seem to make any difference. I've set a seed, and to make it even more easily reproducible, I've loosely followed code from: http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch/msg00799.html. The contiguities (in addition to the data) are now generated directly using the code below.

I'm still getting consistent upward bias for the Intercept, and otherwise perfect

[No se incluye el mensaje original entero]


More information about the R-sig-Geo mailing list