[R-sig-Geo] Collocated Cokriging of snow height data

Edzer Pebesma edzer.pebesma at uni-muenster.de
Mon Nov 30 16:05:20 CET 2009



Stefan Zollinger wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to spatially interpolate snow height data of about 100
> stations in a mountain range. In addition, I have a large DEM (SRTM,
> 90 meters resolution, 2.5 million cells) which also serves as an
> interpolation raster (just like meuse.grid). As the snow height and
> the height above sea level correlate strongly, I intend to use
> collocated cokriging to improve the estimation, which is why I studied
> the example in "Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R" by Roger Bivand,
> Edzer Pebesma and Virgilio Gómez-Rubio.
>
> I have the following questions (especially to the authors):
>
> 1. Why and how is the new attribute "distn" being calculated? Would it
> not be sufficient to use the existing attribute "dist" for the
> collocated cokriging (as it shows the same variogram-model properties)?
it is translated such that it has the same mean as the primary variable,
log(zinc). This is a requirement for collocated (ordinary) cokriging.
>
> 2. How are the two variogram-models "vd.fit" and "vx.fit" being
> calculated out of "v.fit"? I understand that the range and the type of
> the three models remains the same, but how are the sills and nuggets
> being changed?
It is assumed here that dist(n) has the same variogram form as the
primary variable, but scaled with the variance of distn. It should be
noted that in collocted cokriging, only the direct correlation between
zinc and dist is relevant, the (rest of) the distn direct variogram and
cross variogram are ignored in the equations.
>
> 3. How would the calculation of "vd.fit" and " vx.fit" change if a
> trend model was used, like "log(zinc) ~ sqrt(dist)"?
Well, this is a completely different concept: regression instead of
correlation. (Collocated) cokriging assumes zinc and dist are two random
variables, that have a particular (spatial and cross) correlation.
Universal kriging assumes zinc is related to dist through a regression
relationship, implying that dist is non-random but fixed and known, and
zinc is random. It's apples and oranges, really.
>
>
> Any advice or help will be highly appreciated
I can see that this section of the book is indeed very dense;
introductions to collocated cokriging are (IIRC) Pierre Goovaerts book
and perhaps GSLIB literature. Wackernagel's book is also very brief on it.
>
> Stefan Zollinger
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-Geo mailing list
> R-sig-Geo at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo

-- 
Edzer Pebesma
Institute for Geoinformatics (ifgi), University of Münster
Weseler Straße 253, 48151 Münster, Germany. Phone: +49 251
8333081, Fax: +49 251 8339763 http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de/
http://www.springer.com/978-0-387-78170-9 e.pebesma at wwu.de



More information about the R-sig-Geo mailing list