[R-sig-Geo] R vs GSLIB
Edzer J. Pebesma
e.pebesma at geo.uu.nl
Fri Feb 16 11:36:26 CET 2007
Hi Thierry,
I think spatstat covers point pattern analysis, which is mostly not
covered by gslib. I have seen either no or small differences between
gstat and gslib, but never differences that I could not explain. They
may for instance relate to how you integrate covariances over a block;
there's many ways you can do this, all approximate. Other issues are
neighbourhood selections that may be non-unique (e.g. take the nearest
20 neighbours).
I don't know of anyone who did a systematic comparison; you may want to
ask on ai-geostats. I also don't know how to address the gslib
community, if there is one. Has the open source version ever been
updated since the printing of the 2nd edition of the book? Who to
address with bugs or issues?
--
Edzer
ONKELINX, Thierry wrote:
> Dear useRs,
>
>
>
> Currently I'm taking a course on spatial statistics. We use GSLIB in the
> exercises. Maybe I could convince the professor to let the R aficionados
> do their homework with R. So I was wondering if someone had already
> compared the algorithms used in R packages like spatstat and gstat
> versus the algorithms of GSLIB. If both R and GSLIB use similar
> algorithm and hence yield the same results, then we probably can switch
> to R.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Thierry
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> ir. Thierry Onkelinx
>
> Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek / Reseach Institute for Nature
> and Forest
>
> Cel biometrie, methodologie en kwaliteitszorg / Section biometrics,
> methodology and quality assurance
>
> Gaverstraat 4
>
> 9500 Geraardsbergen
>
> Belgium
>
> tel. + 32 54/436 185
>
> Thierry.Onkelinx at inbo.be <mailto:Thierry.Onkelinx at inbo.be>
>
> www.inbo.be <http://www.inbo.be/>
>
>
>
> Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully
> considered what they do not say. ~William W. Watt
>
> A statistical analysis, properly conducted, is a delicate dissection of
> uncertainties, a surgery of suppositions. ~M.J.Moroney
>
>
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-Geo mailing list
> R-sig-Geo at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
>
More information about the R-sig-Geo
mailing list