[R-sig-Geo] When will be WIn binaires available for spgwr and others

[Tim Keitt]

Its better than no package at all, right? I think this is a metadata
issue. If packages were keyworded a la Gentoo, users could mask out
packages that don't pass R package checks, etc. (Maybe that's already in
place. I haven't tracked closely recent changes in R.)

THK

On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 08:32 +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> 
> I'm sorry, I didn't want to bash the "R-spatial" project at all.
> I think it's great that you do lead and coordinate this
> initiative, with such a high quality.
> 
> I somewhat got carried away by the fact (more general) that
> people "publish R packages" but are too lazy to make them pass R
> CMD check.  
> BTW, I don't think a package needs to pass "R-devel CMD check"
> to be accepted for CRAN.
> 
> Regards,
> and thanks once more to the initiatiors and maintainers of the
> R-spatial projects!
> 
> Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
> 
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-Geo mailing list
> R-sig-Geo at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo